I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings Analysis
First Stanza
A free bird leaps on the back
Of the wind and floats downstream
Till the current ends and dips his wing
In the orange suns rays
And dares to claim the sky.
She
refers to nature. She describes the way “a free bird leaps on the back of the
wind”. She describes the bird’s flight against the orange sky. The free bird
has the right “to claim the sky”. The way she describes the “orange sun rays”
gives the reader an appreciation for the natural beauty of the sky, and her
description of the way the bird “dips his wing” helps the reader to appreciate
the bird in his natural habitat, enjoying his freedom.
Second Stanza
But a BIRD that stalks down his narrow cage
Can seldom see through his bars of rage
His wings are clipped and his feet are tied
So he opens his throat to sing.
This
stanza is in stark contrast with the first. By using the word “but” to begin
this stanza, the speaker prepares the reader for this contrast. Then she
describes the “bird that stalks his narrow cage”. The tone is immediately and
drastically changed from peaceful, satisfied, and joyful to one that is dark,
unnerving, and even frustrating. She describes that this caged first “can
seldom see through his bars of rage”. While the free bird gets to enjoy the
full sky, the caged bird rarely even gets a glimpse of the sky. She claims that
“his wings are clipped and his feet are tied”. Text from her autobiography
reveals that Angelou often felt this way in life. She felt restricted from
enjoying the freedom that should have been her right as a human being. The
speaker then reveals that these are the very reasons that the bird “opens his throat
to sing”.
The
author felt this way in her own life. She wrote and sang and danced because it
was her way of expressing her longing for freedom.
Third Stanza
The free bird thinks of another breeze
And the trade winds soft through
The sighing trees
And the fat worms waiting on a dawn-bright
Lawn and he names the sky his own.
The
third stanza reverts back to the free bird, further cementing the difference
between the free bird and the caged bird in the minds of the readers. She
writes that a “free bird thinks of another breeze” that he can enjoy the
“sighing trees” and be free to find his own food. The tone with which she
writes the first and third stanzas so sharply contrasts with the second stanza,
that readers can feel the difference. The first and third stanzas give the
reader a sense of ecstasy and thrill, which serve to make the second stanza
seem all the more droll and even oppressive.
Fourth Stanza
But a caged BIRD stands on the grave of dreams
His shadow shouts on a nightmare scream
His wings are clipped and his feet are tied
So he opens his throat to sing.
The
fourth stanza continues the parallel between the free bird and the caged bird.
The first line serves to starkly contrast the last line in the third stanza. It
is dark and daunting. The reality of the life of the caged bird is revealed in
this line. That bird, “stands on the grave of dreams”. This reveals the
author’s feelings about her own dreams. She has so many dreams that have died
because she was never given the freedom to achieve all that her white
counterparts were able to achieve. Discrimination and Racism made up her cage,
and although she sang, she felt her voice was not heard in the wide world, but
only by those nearest her cage. The second line of this stanza in not only dark,
but even frightening. The speaker describes the bird’s cries as “shouts on a
nightmare scream”. At this point, the caged bird is so despondent in his life
of captivity that his screams are like that of someone having a nightmare. The
author then repeats these lines:
His wings are clipped and his feet are tied
So he opens his throat to sing.
Reaffirming
the idea that the bird opens his mouth to sing because his desire for freedom
and his desire to express himself cannot be contained.
Fifth Stanza
The caged bird sings with
A fearful trill of things unknown
But longed for still and his
Tune is heard on the distant hill
For the caged bird sings of freedom.
This
last stanza focuses on the caged bird yet again. The author implies that even
though the caged bird may have never experienced true freedom, deep down that
bird still knows that it was created to be free. Although freedom, to the caged
bird, is “fearful” because it is “unknown”, he still sings “a fearful trill”
because he still longed for freedom. Here, the speaker reveals that his cry for
freedom is “heard on the distant hill”. This parallels to the author and her
cry for freedom in the form of equality. She feels that her cries are heard,
but only as a soft background noise. She still feels that she is caged and that
although she sings, her cries are heard only as a distant noise.
The
last line states, “For the caged bird sings of freedom”. With this, the speaker
implies that although the caged bird may never have experienced freedom, he
still sings of it because he was created for freedom. This is paralleled to the
African American struggle in Maya Angelou’s time. She feels that black
Americans wrote and sang and danced and cried out for the freedom they
deserved, but they were only heard as a distant voice. Yet, this would not stop
them from crying out for freedom and equality because they knew they were made
for freedom, and they would not relent until they were given their rights as
human beings to enjoy the freedom they were created to enjoy.
No comments:
Post a Comment